Monday, February 23, 2015
All The King's Men CCQC - Graham Vert
Machiavellianism is the concept of using duplicity and manipulation in politics, or simply in one's own life. The concept and usage of this subject in literature often pertains to the inevitable moral corrosiveness of these kinds of actions. All The King's Men deals with this subject on several different levels. The book separates the most powerful character, Willie, from the audience by making the narrator a man close to him, but not Willie himself. This leaves Willie's motives and inner conflicts open to interpretation. He seems to truly want to be a transformative figure for his state, saying he is "Hell bent on making the second Gettysburg Address" when he writes his speech on page 99. Though he begins the book as a more idealistic, optimistic individual, he quickly becomes consumed by both power and bureaucracy. On page 151, Sadie Burke refers to Willie as "The Boss," making him sound more like a mob kingpin than a politician, and the cautionary tale of Cass Mastern's metaphorical spider on page 266 eerily parallels what Jack and Willie are trying to do-- though they're making their mark on the world, they're going about it in the wrong way. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Another example of Willie's downward spiral into bureaucratic corruption and apish political tactics is on page 192, where Willie commands Jack to go and " ... see if you can beat some sense into Sim Harmon's head." This is startlingly similar to Machiavelli's essay "The Morals of the Prince" that we just read. What Willie exhibits in front of his 'subjects' if you will, is what an idealistic person would desire from the governor, while behind closed doors Willie uses brutal mob tactics to get his job done. As Machiavelli stated "It is good to appear merciful, truthful, humane, sincere, and religious; it is good to be so in reality. But you must keep your mind so disposed that, in case of need, you can turn to the exact contrary." This book may disprove his statement, however.
ReplyDelete